* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/3] pym/portage/package/ebuild/fetch.py: Factor out _get_fetch_resume_size
@ 2014-01-20 2:01 99% ` W. Trevor King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: W. Trevor King @ 2014-01-20 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Tom Wijsman; +Cc: gentoo-portage-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 501 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:41:41AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> There is some duplicate code here, I think the conditions can be
> rewritten in such way that the duplicate code doesn't take place.
Do you want a rewrite squashed into this commit, or as a follow-on
commit after this one (which gets a test suite in v3)?
Cheers,
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-19 3:07 [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring W. Trevor King
2014-01-19 3:07 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/3] pym/portage/package/ebuild/fetch.py: Factor out _get_fetch_resume_size W. Trevor King
2014-01-20 1:41 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20 2:01 99% ` W. Trevor King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox