* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring
@ 2014-01-19 22:46 99% ` W. Trevor King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: W. Trevor King @ 2014-01-19 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:39:03PM +0100, Sebastian Luther wrote:
> Am 19.01.2014 04:07, schrieb W. Trevor King:
> > The patches aren't particularly well tested yet. I ran the test suite
> > and got some errors, but they seemed to be related to my non-root
> > invocation, and not due to these changes themselves. I thought I'd
> > post my work so far, before digging deeper into the test suite.
>
> Since I doubt there's currently any test or any way to write one,
I'm working on a pym/portage/tests/ebuild/test_fetch.py to exercise
the helpers. Will post in v3.
> I'd suggest to try and run emerge and analyze coverage with
> dev-python/coverage or a similar tool.
Also a good idea. I'll have to dust off my coverage notes ;).
Thanks,
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-19 3:07 [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring W. Trevor King
2014-01-19 21:39 ` Sebastian Luther
2014-01-19 22:46 99% ` W. Trevor King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox