* [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: EAPI 6
@ 2020-03-14 20:40 99% ` Samuel Bernardo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Samuel Bernardo @ 2020-03-14 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Zac Medico; +Cc: gentoo-portage-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 536 bytes --]
Thank you very much Zac for your answers.
I was wondering if I was missing any coding convention after reading
[1], since I always follow the pattern to define eclasses inside my
overlays as needed, sometimes overriding those provided from gentoo
portage. I was not sure if I was doing the development breaking the
expected QA rules.
With your explanation I know now that I'm doing it the right way.
[1]
https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#qa-notice----eclass-foo-inherited-illegally
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2020-03-12 10:42 [gentoo-portage-dev] EAPI 6 Samuel Bernardo
2020-03-14 14:20 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Samuel Bernardo
2020-03-14 18:48 ` Zac Medico
2020-03-14 20:40 99% ` Samuel Bernardo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox