From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540811381F3 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1BC421C03B; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7097221C030 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (ip68-5-185-102.oc.oc.cox.net [68.5.185.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 335B9340CCC for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v5] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720) To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1461156925-29612-1-git-send-email-adam@armills.info> <5719DC57.2070309@gentoo.org> From: Zac Medico Message-ID: <571A3D37.50704@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:03:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5719DC57.2070309@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 57e18712-a3c4-46a3-ba8b-405b8a7ba89b X-Archives-Hash: 91bf761fae04d029dfe233a4ea683b28 On 04/22/2016 01:09 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > Definitely a huge improvement over v1. Thanks a lot for taking the > time and making the effort. You've been a great contributor! > > I'll leave the final word to Zac, but the patch looks OK to me now. If > it's OK by Zac, I'll merge it quick as. > Looks good to me. -- Thanks, Zac