From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F9B1384B4 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72225E0857; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D81FAE0854 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (ip174-67-193-3.oc.oc.cox.net [174.67.193.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8302B34076D for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHES] EAPI 6 updates To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1447091377-2902-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> From: Zac Medico Message-ID: <56437A7C.7030800@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:27:24 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1447091377-2902-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 71b3d986-612b-4a92-af3d-68e47d176bf8 X-Archives-Hash: c43e48baf09b9d95b529b8b9791bbb74 On 11/09/2015 09:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > A quick set of patches updating Portage's EAPI 6 implementation to match > late changes in the spec and the discussion around it. Please review. > > The only thing missing is the bash compatibility setting. However, as I > see it it's optional and requires some serious thinking about potential > issues and implications on Portage bash functions. > > After this, I think we're ready to enable EAPI 6 though I'd appreciate > if more eyes confirmed we're PMS-compliant. > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > The whole series looks good. -- Thanks, Zac