From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E1113888F for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D12CE084B; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FDD5E0826 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (ip174-67-205-96.oc.oc.cox.net [174.67.205.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53E8B33BF0C for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: Finally deprecate base.eclass To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1444548200-3454-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <561A8B6C.2030001@gentoo.org> <20151011184556.56798721.mgorny@gentoo.org> <561A9398.7040103@gentoo.org> From: Zac Medico Message-ID: <561AB733.4060508@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:23:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <561A9398.7040103@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: be0be13a-819e-40b7-9309-2f6160dbcc6b X-Archives-Hash: 0b80794f30dcb2f3e8ac83e281a610c2 On 10/11/2015 09:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 11/10/15 18:45, Michał Górny wrote: >> Nope, don't have any. Though AFAICS there's all-over-the-place >> consensus that it's deprecated, and most of the developers complain >> when they see it. > If you can show me the consensus, I'll ACK it. Alternatively anyone > else on the team that have observed this consensus may ACK it. I've found a tracker bug here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497022 -- Thanks, Zac