Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] repoman: ignore unadded files when possible (bug 559636)

[Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>]

On 09/05/2015 09:16 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sat,  5 Sep 2015 07:31:27 -0700
> Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Unadded files that are excluded from the Manifest are safe to ignore.
>>
>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 559636
>> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559636
>> ---
>> [PATCH v2] fixes it to properly check the find_invalid_path_char
>> return value bin/repoman | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/bin/repoman b/bin/repoman
>> index 1ba7841..2c42c2d 100755
>> --- a/bin/repoman
>> +++ b/bin/repoman
>> @@ -2570,7 +2570,11 @@ else:
>>  	if myunadded:
>>  		for x in range(len(myunadded)-1, -1, -1):
>>  			xs = myunadded[x].split("/")
>> -			if xs[-1] == "files":
>> +			if
>> repo_config.find_invalid_path_char(myunadded[x]) != -1:
>> +				# The Manifest excludes this file,
>> +				# so it's safe to ignore.
>> +				del myunadded[x]
>> +			elif xs[-1] == "files":
>>  				print("!!! files dir is not added!
>> Please correct this.") sys.exit(-1)
>>  			elif xs[-1] == "Manifest":
> 
> uhg :( not another patch to "old" repoman code.
> 
> I really want to get the rewrite code into portage master BEFORE any
> more patches, or changes are applied.  There has been enough changes,
> that even the simplest small change can make it a rebase nightmare.
> 
> At this point, I will only accept patches on the rewrite
> 

Fair enough. I'll just rebase the patch after the rewrite is merged.
-- 
Thanks,
Zac