From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0A0138CDB for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 207EEE087B; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0A1E086F for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.128.12.146] (unknown [100.42.98.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18468340BA1 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <55788272.9060206@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:31:14 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] require PORTAGE_{BIN,PYM}_PATH not be cleared References: <1433140493-3288-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1433951109-18393-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1433951109-18393-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f02ba198-ec81-416d-8ea9-f2219f7af0e6 X-Archives-Hash: 406b2c830e2070a987ace98b6bd05a1b On 06/10/2015 08:45 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Rather than hardcode a full path everywhere as a fallback, assume the > value is always set to the right location. The current path isn't the > right place anymore already. > > If it turns out we want to support this scenario, we can do it via a > bunch of bootstrapping (and symlinked) files. > --- LGTM -- Thanks, Zac