From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A310138CA2 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B91A6E0898; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D24E0885 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.31.145] (unknown [100.42.98.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E08F340A7A for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <553688C3.1020300@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:28:35 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK References: <1429559160-11646-1-git-send-email-bertrand@jacquin.bzh> <55358E1D.1070801@gentoo.org> <55359BBB.4080605@gentoo.org> <553632C5.2070508@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <553632C5.2070508@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9b27384e-5fba-4fff-8668-00293684dda8 X-Archives-Hash: 0d98a0ee2670f0c1fc78b09660104ba2 On 04/21/2015 04:21 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 04/21/2015 05:48 AM, Duncan wrote: >>> >>> Well, I don't use INSTALL_MASK myself, so I don't have a real-world >>> use-case for you. However, it's clear that the code will expand shell >>> globs, so I preserved that behavior for compatibility. >> >> I do, with shell globs, tho I didn't bother checking the above to see if >> they'd have been affected. >> > > The docs for INSTALL_MASK (man 5 make.conf) don't mention that globs > will work. It's expecting a "space delimited list of file names." Does > it really take a space-delimited list of globs instead? If so, how does > that reconcile with the fact that * could match spaces? How does it conflict? -- Thanks, Zac