On 01/18/2015 11:58 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:38:38 +0100
> Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Default MAKEOPTS job number to (number of CPUs + 1) when it is not
>> provided in the ebuild environment.
>>
>> Suggested-By: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@funtoo.org>
>> ---
>>  pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py |  8 +++++++-
>>  pym/portage/util/cpuinfo.py            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 pym/portage/util/cpuinfo.py
>>
> 
> 
> looks good, merge please
> 
I realize I'm a little bit late here, but after extensive testing with
multiple different schedulers that NUMCPU provides equivalent
performance, or even outperforms NUMCPU+1.  I think that changes from 1
cpu to NUMCPU is good enough, and we don't need to test thrashing the
scheduler.

Thanks,
Zero