From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E016B138A1A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 396BFE0872; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A515E07E0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.31.246] (unknown [100.42.98.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A29233406A9; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54B3F0F4.1000902@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:06:12 -0800 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= CC: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org, robbat2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Allow virtuals in package.provided References: <1417797794-19449-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <5483F44E.3080000@gentoo.org> <20150112103443.0a0bf6e0@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150112103443.0a0bf6e0@pomiot.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d9ab779d-6554-4e09-80c0-4dc8e3cbf2a7 X-Archives-Hash: a69d938db1093dd457eb827ce30f9bf0 On 01/12/2015 01:34 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-12-06, o godz. 22:31:42 > Zac Medico napisał(a): > >> @Robin: This patch reverts the changes from bug 161003. Maybe this >> constraint is not needed anymore? > > Considering the feedback on the bug, ok to push this one finally? > Yes, please do. -- Thanks, Zac