From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473271389E2 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7902E082F; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667AEE0810 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.112] (unknown [195.254.219.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D47CF340545 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <549815A5.4070404@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:59:17 +0100 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support override of default profile EAPI (532670) References: <1418845194-24791-1-git-send-email-zmedico@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1418845194-24791-1-git-send-email-zmedico@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 429c2a35-e801-4388-a27d-958c483ac940 X-Archives-Hash: baf057f4b209024ada457b3eb789dd4e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 The idea presented in the commit message header is very good. The implementation discussed in the commit message body sounds a bit messy, but I can't immediately think of another way to support this. Can you? Can anyone else? I'd like to have more of a discussion before this is merged. The patch itself looks OK though. - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlSYFaUACgkQRtClrXBQc7Ut3gD+KG/uQQtaN1yfNGY+OLQQE3f9 K1pzuHW8b3ZrX/EztFIA/jcpdgacbOm5JiscSOwnm4KPW52RuytctFAmo2C+Jixg =Gqzv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----