From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DF413877A for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECCF8E0BAA; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440BDE0BA8 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.112] (unknown [195.254.219.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09AEE34043A for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53EBB0DF.8000402@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:39:27 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes References: <1407836235-13528-1-git-send-email-bernalex@gentoo.org> <53EB8D23.20208@gentoo.org> <20140813094532.6ba40f8f.dolsen@gentoo.org> <53EB98BC.4050404@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a4bf14c2-19ec-4ca1-aeae-0f70e5020e64 X-Archives-Hash: d95ec937f8fdee71f6a5e2f42f352e49 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 13/08/14 19:59, Duncan wrote: > * I don't want portage writing mask/use changes on its own under > any circumstances, as I use directories and have my own idea of > what files I want stuff in. It never has, and these patches never have implemented this. You raised the same concerns a year ago, and they did not make sense then either. > The patches as they are now would change that, giving me no way to > still get the suggestions with --ask, without chancing the actual > write of those changes. The patches do not do that. > The only other /possible/ objection I see is the potential > version- dependent confusion over --autounmask behavior. This is one of the reasons I am kind of neutral on applying them at all at this point. > But I don't feel strongly about that. Me neither. - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlPrsN8ACgkQRtClrXBQc7W1HgEApAThYm9jvpGDOeoczC67/3eY ORcLtHG2c6UGoI3mwhgBALHfnxR4qJk19c8KeDK4H7d/9+g0O45ZAr/Gdo5Wf2z5 =l15a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----