From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E8C13877A for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA7CFE09B6; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F96E099F for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.112] (unknown [195.254.219.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0312340433 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53EB8D23.20208@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:06:59 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes References: <1407836235-13528-1-git-send-email-bernalex@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1407836235-13528-1-git-send-email-bernalex@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: bd34a38d-537b-49fd-87c3-249216f3742c X-Archives-Hash: 5fbe035ec7970fa71c495af974d75bc0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Evidently MichaƂ was a bit sceptical. And anyway, I don't care too much about these patches any longer. Maybe it comes with raising in the ranks, but 2014 me is not particularly sympathetic of 2013 me and his stupid patches. These days I just prefer fixing bugs and not changing anything. So on that note, if nobody objects, I suggest we just ignore the autounmask refactor altogether. Instead I'll just make the actual bugfix (make --ask imply --autounmask-write) a standalone patch which I'll submit to the list. Sounds good to everyone? - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlPrjSMACgkQRtClrXBQc7UbzgD+IrQtwow8PvZrRYJMGOc/RfgR DtkIncGKQ75uHYEiQQcA/iYUsRLgVgYYm11DI6QIu0DQi1NGZNJ61/sB7WrICQz+ =ARIp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----