From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFF4138CE3 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7411FE0B24; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CCCE0AD7 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.3] ([88.150.18.76]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFdPZ-1Vy29P1Cnl-00EcYK for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:12:26 +0100 Message-ID: <52F7C505.3030702@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:12:21 +0100 From: Sebastian Luther User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131111 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New Portage release References: <20140208090315.GP70664@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140208090315.GP70664@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Mp0cayhDgwaPlNMHniBhlRHAja1i5bF0FJNEyWE8uj8B3e+oq6e ValPQuXJYoljUURjXULJjGPvH4QeJ+ei3x+VT+8DHvvR5BVqibDivCyDg3gBIbGv1WfVS+X WsfHjN9mQDPg8JXiyzQBIL/ja4wymNP8zcCT0zX28QkqbxiHhVkkMU6BoM1S5JTSMnrkVIu PYZeYwTOG5lJ8yJt9N8gA== X-Archives-Salt: 3fd65dd5-dd51-48e8-9b45-b97231af3071 X-Archives-Hash: 484d3104ad5c54d218f0bb0204794419 Am 08.02.2014 10:03, schrieb Fabian Groffen: > Hey all, > > I'm sorry if this has been discussed previously. I admit not having > read all of the mails on this list recently. > > Long story short: what are the plans on releasing 2.2.9? I think there aren't any plans atm. > > Longer version: for Prefix I likely need a new release soon to get some > fixes out of the door. Since I like to stay on par with mainline > portage's versioning here, I've been going along with mainline portage's > releases for a while, which worked fine. Now we haven't got a release > for a long while, what's the plans here? Is there anyone at all who > can/dares to spin a release? > The approach with 2.2.8 was to do it once someone sees the need to do it. I think that's just a reasonable approach we could continue to use. I don't see a problem with releasing 2.2.9 if you want that for prefix. > Apologies in advance if this has been discussed recently. > > Thanks, > Fabian >