* [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update
@ 2013-02-19 20:12 Pacho Ramos
2013-02-19 22:27 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2013-02-19 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]
Hello
For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to
test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't
had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running
udev-19x for a long time. Yesterday, my father mailed me because he got
udev update from 17x to 19x and emerge @preserved-rebuild only rebuilt
gcc, keeping other broken packages untouched (while revdep-rebuild
rebuilt them)
Do you know what kind of information could I demand him to help diagnose
the problem?
Thanks a lot
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update
2013-02-19 20:12 [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update Pacho Ramos
@ 2013-02-19 22:27 ` Zac Medico
2013-02-20 20:53 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2013-02-19 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 02/19/2013 12:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to
> test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't
> had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running
> udev-19x for a long time. Yesterday, my father mailed me because he got
> udev update from 17x to 19x and emerge @preserved-rebuild only rebuilt
> gcc, keeping other broken packages untouched (while revdep-rebuild
> rebuilt them)
>
> Do you know what kind of information could I demand him to help diagnose
> the problem?
It only works if the broken packages have references to the libudev.so.0
(or maybe libgudev-1.0.so.0) soname in their
/var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.2 files.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update
2013-02-19 22:27 ` Zac Medico
@ 2013-02-20 20:53 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-20 21:02 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2013-02-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1054 bytes --]
El mar, 19-02-2013 a las 14:27 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 02/19/2013 12:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to
> > test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't
> > had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running
> > udev-19x for a long time. Yesterday, my father mailed me because he got
> > udev update from 17x to 19x and emerge @preserved-rebuild only rebuilt
> > gcc, keeping other broken packages untouched (while revdep-rebuild
> > rebuilt them)
> >
> > Do you know what kind of information could I demand him to help diagnose
> > the problem?
>
> It only works if the broken packages have references to the libudev.so.0
> (or maybe libgudev-1.0.so.0) soname in their
> /var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.2 files.
Will need to recheck in next breakage then :/
Any suggestion about how to proceed when I hit this kind of problem? (I
mean, what can I provide you to try to fix this cases)
Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update
2013-02-20 20:53 ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2013-02-20 21:02 ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zac Medico @ 2013-02-20 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev
On 02/20/2013 12:53 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 19-02-2013 a las 14:27 -0800, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 02/19/2013 12:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to
>>> test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't
>>> had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running
>>> udev-19x for a long time. Yesterday, my father mailed me because he got
>>> udev update from 17x to 19x and emerge @preserved-rebuild only rebuilt
>>> gcc, keeping other broken packages untouched (while revdep-rebuild
>>> rebuilt them)
>>>
>>> Do you know what kind of information could I demand him to help diagnose
>>> the problem?
>>
>> It only works if the broken packages have references to the libudev.so.0
>> (or maybe libgudev-1.0.so.0) soname in their
>> /var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.2 files.
>
> Will need to recheck in next breakage then :/
>
> Any suggestion about how to proceed when I hit this kind of problem? (I
> mean, what can I provide you to try to fix this cases)
Create a tarball of /var/db/pkg when it's in a misbehaving state, so we
can us it for analysis later, after the state has changed.
--
Thanks,
Zac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-20 21:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-19 20:12 [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge @preserved-rebuild not rebuilding all broken packages after udev update Pacho Ramos
2013-02-19 22:27 ` Zac Medico
2013-02-20 20:53 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-20 21:02 ` Zac Medico
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox