From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D28B138010 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3431121C085 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B43A21C00D for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.26.5] (ip98-164-193-252.oc.oc.cox.net [98.164.193.252]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zmedico) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09DC6335E30; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5060D330.3010406@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:40:00 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120901 Thunderbird/15.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: Dennis Schridde Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Please review: manpage-hdepend References: <1348488962-4275-1-git-send-email-devurandom@gmx.net> <5060CACA.7080203@gentoo.org> <1697784.01hri9jjAp@ernie> In-Reply-To: <1697784.01hri9jjAp@ernie> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4c678dd6-9336-4fdf-a6d3-6391ef3bb1e2 X-Archives-Hash: 82a0db5c0eba041e8b59c19b99a04884 On 09/24/2012 02:18 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote: > Hi! > > Am Montag, 24. September 2012, 14:04:10 schrieb Zac Medico: >> On 09/24/2012 05:16 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote: >> Thanks, I've applied your patches. I've also made some changes here: > Tow comments: > * I tried to use \fI for emphasis, cmdline flags and other "minor" things, and > \fB for references to variables, sections, manpages, etc. (Re: "\fBdo not\fR", > "\fBdo\fR") Okay, will change those to italics. > * Why did you drop "defaulting to only \fBRDEPEND\fR" from the Target > subsection describing --root-deps? Was it wrong? I tried to give a quick > overview over how cross-compilation is handled and what behaviour to expect. The default for --root-deps is actually all deps (DEPEND, RDEPEND, and PDEPEND). For --root-deps=rdeps it's RDEPEND and PDEPEND. -- Thanks, Zac