From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FJgUq-00053l-NS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:37:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2G0aODp006336; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:36:24 GMT Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslb-082-083-034-186.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.34.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2G0aNtV022489 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:36:23 GMT Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id 8CC70281FB; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:36:18 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-gr0-genone_0.7 (2005-09-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (sven [192.168.0.1]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45500281F0 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:36:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4418A6D5.1010903@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:44:21 +0200 From: Marius Mauch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Manifest2 reloaded References: <20060304035031.4a7aa82b@delenn.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20060304035031.4a7aa82b@delenn.genone.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fa8ea70b-1916-4006-9d7d-591bb9862114 X-Archives-Hash: f53893b01cfec6f5c047e7b5c6a93468 Marius Mauch schrieb: > The first should be delayed until there is some consensus how the gpg > stuff should work in the future, the others I don't see the use for. > Also I only checked portage.py for changes, so emerge/repoman/... might > still have to be fixed. > Last but not least: I did some basic testing with this and the > important stuff seems to work, but I'm quite sure the code still has a > lot of bugs/issues, and this being a core functionality it needs a > *lot* of testing, so I'd really appreciate if you could all give it a > spin (but do not commit anything to the tree without manually checking > it first). Does the lack of feedback (only got a reaction from Brian so far) mean that noone tried it or that it doesn't have any issues? Marius -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list