From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3HfZ-0005dH-UY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:20:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BIJIp9028210; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:19:18 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BIJGWD005055 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:19:17 GMT Received: from [35.9.140.85] (host-4185.dhcp.egr.msu.edu [35.9.140.85]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BIK6vt015290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:20:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42FB96CE.6090906@egr.msu.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:19:58 -0400 From: Alec Warner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (X11/20050724) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Korn CC: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Next major version References: <1123700491.29247.56.camel@localhost> <42FA540E.2080900@egr.msu.edu> <20050811195149.4957adf5.chris@chkorn.de> In-Reply-To: <20050811195149.4957adf5.chris@chkorn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 92cc908a-fa25-4b08-b2f2-ca9ece7bd130 X-Archives-Hash: a8d8251f4c04928ba8e4ddc59730c2c9 Christopher Korn wrote: >>>Hi Jason and other folks, >>>I saw your last comment on >>>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 about most the these >>>feature to be present in the next major version. That is really >>>great to read. >>> >>>On that subject, I'd like to have an idea about when we should >>>expect that next version. >>> >>>That said, I think it would be helpful to have a portage developper >>>site. Perhaps there is and I dont know... >>> >>> >> That would require someone writing one, so if you are >>volunteering ;) >> >> > > >Writing is not the problem. But without (proper) information it is hard >to write a documentation or something like this. > > >Chris > > I had a wiki that attempted to cover portage-2.0 api documentation as well as anything written for 2.1 but lost much of the work in a transition from windows to linux ( I screwed up the SQl backups :) ). I thought about putting something up on the devwiki but I haven't proposed anything because no one really likes a wiki for API docs. As for API docs, there are none at present; and there are no plans for any stable docs, IIRC. As for a developer website, what kinds of information are you looking for? -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list