From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 186 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 15:57:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 15:57:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CYRQN-0004Hq-BI for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:57:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 1512 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2004 15:57:17 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12822 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 15:57:17 +0000 Message-ID: <41A9F55A.5030403@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:57:14 -0500 From: Aaron Walker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041119) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20041127232254.GA358@halffull.org> <20041128002838.57c9ea59@snowdrop.home> <200411281248.38779.trapni@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200411281248.38779.trapni@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Disabling "strip" in Emerge X-Archives-Salt: cdaff016-583b-4635-80d3-5a97a08cef9c X-Archives-Hash: 43ad52206bccd3a2ae3d215c833d788f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Parpart wrote: | On Sunday 28 November 2004 1:28 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | |>On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:24:44 -0800 (PST) Sorav Bansal |> |> wrote: |>| Hence, any project that calls install -s will be troublesome for me. |>| Anyways, I really appreciate your help. In case you have any |>| suggestions on how to get around the install -s problem, that would be |>| great! |> Another possibility is that -s is passed in LDFLAGS. vixie-cron is one example of an app that does this in the upstream Makefile. |>As I recall from when we first started messing around with cross |>compiling (we couldn't get strip to work...) the easiest way is to make |>strip a symlink to /bin/true... | | | OTOH, it shall be possible to provide a new eclass function (maybe executed by | default) that modifies each existing Makefile that strips out all -s right | behind "install" commands. Just like done with strip-flags for C[XX]FLAGS. Since when does anything in flag-o-matic go anywhere near a Makefile? - -- You're at the end of the road again.  Aaron Walker < ka0ttic@gentoo.org > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ka0ttic/ Gentoo/BSD | cron | shell-tools http://butsugenjitemple.org/~ka0ttic/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBqfVZC3poscuANHARArdrAJ9dZRN3LaEvhA0cMGVEw7fAXP673wCfZ3mh iI6kNKpWSUE2Ryd9dnqp4K8= =u9eo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list