From: ashish gawarikar <ashish@sendmail.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Hello
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:00:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <416C45F0.4000001@sendmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410121337.20556.george@gentoo.org>
>Hm, I am afraid there is no trivial way to do this, short of collating
>contents of all these packages in a single ebuild. However this:
>1. is ugly
>2. will not work if there are interdependencies within this set of packages
>
>
That is the exactly why I doing this. We plan to deploy the packages
included that have right interdependencies.
>Well, it should be possible if you split this package in two (and if it is
>only the downloading part that you want to combine):
>one downloads and unpacks the meta-tarball that you package yourself (should
>have src_unpack placing extracted individual tarballs into ${D}/${DISTDIR}
>and empty scr_compile/install)
>second just lists the dependencies as mentioned before.
>
>
>
so you mean something like
dummy-download-1.0.0.ebuild => contains foo/bar etc
dummy-extract-1.0.0.ebuild => something like kde-base?
>Although I fail to see why would you want to do something like that. I mean
>what is the situation when it is better to roll your own meta tarballs rather
>than fetch individual ones? Well, bittorrent will be more efficient with
>single large package rather than multiple small ones, but other than that I
>am quite puzzled :).
>
>
>
The advantage of doing this is viz:
1. QA has to test one huge download and dont have to test different
scenarios.
2. You exactly know what packages you are getting in this download
3. You have to issue one-and-only-one command for upgrade
Thanks for all your help,
Ashish
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-12 18:56 [gentoo-portage-dev] Hello Ashish Gawarikar
2004-10-12 19:10 ` George Shapovalov
2004-10-12 20:02 ` Ashish Gawarikar
2004-10-12 20:37 ` George Shapovalov
2004-10-12 21:00 ` ashish gawarikar [this message]
2004-10-12 21:26 ` Nick Dimiduk
2004-10-12 21:36 ` Colin Kingsley
2004-10-13 0:46 ` George Shapovalov
2004-10-13 0:58 ` George Shapovalov
2004-10-12 23:09 ` George Prowse
2004-10-13 7:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-12 20:06 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-12 20:40 ` Marius Mauch
2004-10-13 9:43 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-10-13 10:04 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-13 12:22 ` Marius Mauch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-31 20:38 [gentoo-portage-dev] hello ferringb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=416C45F0.4000001@sendmail.com \
--to=ashish@sendmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox