From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7177E13888F for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 957DEE084B; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0757DE0848 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (77-254-165-0.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.165.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F3ED340545; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 18:45:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Alexander Berntsen Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: Finally deprecate base.eclass Message-ID: <20151011184556.56798721.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <561A8B6C.2030001@gentoo.org> References: <1444548200-3454-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <561A8B6C.2030001@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/ovLQFG7OuKsKGqjbdhcXSGM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 45afdc24-3880-429f-a8b4-9c108b3d5af0 X-Archives-Hash: 90cec3fe8ac9a984ed3cacc2c9c847b0 --Sig_/ovLQFG7OuKsKGqjbdhcXSGM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2015-10-11, o godz. 18:16:44 Alexander Berntsen napisa=C5=82(a): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 >=20 > I don't even remember the last time this was discussed. Could you link > to some discussion or a decision on this? Nope, don't have any. Though AFAICS there's all-over-the-place consensus that it's deprecated, and most of the developers complain when they see it. > Also, this patch won't actually apply to HEAD since you are basing it > on one of your patches that aren't in yet. Try to avoid that in the > future. If I based it on HEAD, it wouldn't apply with the other patch on ;-P. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/ovLQFG7OuKsKGqjbdhcXSGM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWGpJEXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZO+WIP/17RVRJHvHXfbNrx29Qd7fTT W2EwY3VQZfotn68EXoq2nHVNSpgV7RH8ZEOn2cvQjI5nrr9GINIYqLxJTcom0I1Y KCzWoCWGxO5/ggY9HfQ90OLDTXcdNcH0FDdc6Y/HRnXih0VhUD7I5UkkkYXihP0j 8ox0DcTfxG3ted6iiss2J+ZS3YH2KQl3NIwA1CWWFFy4zMclNw7T+GspCRov9beU li4y2kfLBkQX81RCQEL7yyN+SNl59yb6Xh5FLIvqJhIvuM6XWvPwtut7rrnMnM8f pmHxxBp2fvZ3gz+E45/yHuqRKczrCRbN+hG+evA8y41uzzYakIZzsCTIrpYeL+wS iOF9DBwIPb0X5PKO/FKYzlALv5aRB4eqXZE0fT5MWOz3rjcqcVRWpCWyL+v29usp mXLckdzIiETYCzVCdn0kK+i+rQMHm/INctYbEPqpNdt+Whzm6hGpYkbvHy3dUJdP 0bKQD3Pyln+DG7+TCTIhIzMNQHH4NoEf4Lq9+6MzKSIFScUtOplWwNLdOXbEjw4v h1tTfJXwYR8kyHCklgbuN+QPCKM9vB1n8Wlv/HZkssNckJwoXfYqehcFUJsFp9QU vGoLKOZe4qqBqaXaDKObGk5THXsftRQ3gGAiHnRjVLXfoun/ZeMvo8+lBuWjuhFt IzHKS1S5TAZZLjIPvdma =DVek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ovLQFG7OuKsKGqjbdhcXSGM--