From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D56138CDB for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1EB2E088A; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594F2E0886 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22E4B340B6A for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 06:17:02 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] install-qa-check.d: issue warnings for 32bit ELFs not using LFS Message-ID: <20150611101702.GM13517@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1432626293-22692-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1432650278-31471-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <5564983E.20306@gentoo.org> <20150530143534.GE2101@vapier> <20150611002120.0b0ea7f3.dolsen@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gblAvmLjk8yGG9If" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150611002120.0b0ea7f3.dolsen@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 615dbe5c-a0df-45bc-9986-84c85cbabf42 X-Archives-Hash: 54af66c1bde645ec817d3cf6b4702cb6 --gblAvmLjk8yGG9If Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11 Jun 2015 00:21, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sat, 30 May 2015 10:36:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > so if we're happy with this implementation, i'll start a thread on > > gentoo-dev so people aren't caught by surprise, and we can merge this > > for the next release. -mike >=20 > So, what's the status of this one? I don't recall many responses to > the -dev thread. i'll be pushing it at some point. guess i could do it now since it doesn't= =20 depend on anything else. -mike --gblAvmLjk8yGG9If Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVeWAeAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBqI8P/Rkdz9TbcEkm9RfUMMyIxK7F lSNIKCPXXAM3TbY4HyyqYyfsHOlJosnW55Njp6800FSK77l3L66mO+8nI06sWD3A lpXJbq5krOAlGhyfyhftLccLibDrhxkfqQs6pzB1NyXVEkzOOCoaWHrlh4FIhskW ++uT5/NLN7ClD7NBsApAPzNANVAx4LIkrUfOLkxz+NqRxt6mgs4NnAeY1+tjKvvj 2qyZFmKZUEZYTL27uamCWBGYUfwZ/euihzHzaaPOa/a/g69mEvXVE42BClrddkcL h97JrvvLRdYsVjrAuYhfcvcj1tu4YKvbw57DqPU4zT5uhJQik+fLSwePdix+SSe4 WeRDyTZlYZWYL4L1usxxrkaqT4SagKZ8YBIfd3J76myk9IaV3rIYJZ2oLZ2cxxOT 5HM1Bf4CGHvo9fL48iAeul/7q7ptguMpDqpLWMpgyyJZg9bO1COIkRnCQdnMvMJn kSJzJQppS0KHbrDncn68a2x/5ZkzaspLA0dEOC+DNpYqjbrrqSMAAcMkwJWHUmwa MAztHoOIKP9iXOeUK7/VXZfE8NIPIz+9Nxx+tGHDQze5hpY+gamRjpRS2Jp8Xdos PkzUs8xz8FVOnRBBYqEn6EER003BMWR2rZsNbGdk0Ypx77fLOtQRjqQ9x77KHmd5 nR6FbfQW/Q9Ad7XqDiO9 =sixn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gblAvmLjk8yGG9If--