From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92815138C9D for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2C92E0879; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A02CE0870 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7091B340C18 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:34:19 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make PORTAGE_BIN_PATH settings relocatable Message-ID: <20150602153419.GE23039@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1433140493-3288-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20150601172524.GU4496@vapier> <556CA924.6010406@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556CA924.6010406@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 552e8914-ed49-41fa-926c-268fccb2cdbd X-Archives-Hash: d953dfd3399bc1896cab0cc58ec4b487 --dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01 Jun 2015 11:49, Zac Medico wrote: > On 06/01/2015 10:25 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > (a) just throw an error and exit when PORTAGE_BIN_PATH is not set ...= =20 > > considering the current portage code points to a path where it is no lo= nger=20 > > installed, maybe that's ok ? the recent changes to make portage instal= l copies > > for each python version is what broke it i think. >=20 > I like this idea. I can't think of a reason why we should allow > PORTAGE_BIN_PATH to be unset. i'll try this in the CrOS project where we're using Gentoo/Prefix and see h= ow it=20 goes. and then try it on my system for a while to further check it. other= wise i'll go with Tim's inspired idea about symlinked wrappers. -mike --dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVbcz7AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBPb8P/A/MlyMUCvSsPUtIkZqWWBIU saJUXXv++lHI22w050Gui7gUWCuAWfiu2qIQUyjVvzyQVHG35KqVHN9XahECj0VH XXSKIfBJ1KGEVYuZAmjdksD/1KdVjpXaramagJAlnEvz+Dbg7g9Np4lC+fafdonE Ohvg0DVF6cVPreYj8QMjuTAaXBszxsxa/12cQV3wO8DCV5AKuzUO5qBNXvVOhfLc L+1vPV5HPKxEkK0u0oz1sXhK36F2PvS2j78x+OkFWS/Qem/dpV/qS3zkl+KhimOv YmGW/LJD9VhkCFvjM15ts6FSnNsudOTSHgEhn6KEkV9GtbJNvIhbFM6dK34T2hk/ hWQkOxPTzrVJ/BEQUqayL2nh/1ZdajMowYCgJuoP92ql0nQjmXl4Kc1W/BeXnaVc TQFEkHCIfguzo3xXCvjSCYJ9RP97YgOFFpO0vz2Krt9IG9n0hlzeh6JFPFnLt8+5 szD1wMtEWna9vTE7+LxrE7LeqPjN+KkAoW4ObaIaTpQ6//cosEhtGgSR+oe1SkKz Lf1bpiduN+SiiY+StyI7yUvG370W3f8QClb4n4BZdEszrUA6GEzLQhkAUW9x1R+c 0foWfc5TfXM9cfa3JmgTFcO/krMv1pS/owgc331D4AZWVFOWxjLzWDNyN+uG+BqX OzEnxTyIwgHlILU/A7wy =6791 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dFWYt1i2NyOo1oI9--