From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF46138C9D for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CF0BE09EA; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0FCFE09E7 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFCAB340E71 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 11:33:13 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] officially drop support for python 2.6, 3.1, and 3.2 Message-ID: <20150602153313.GD23039@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1432997883-13531-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <556CCBAA.8050504@gentoo.org> <20150602044259.GY4496@vapier> <556D35E3.20303@gentoo.org> <20150602144318.GA23039@vapier> <556DC275.1050202@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556DC275.1050202@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 88ec2776-3cf3-42fd-b87b-fb7ad180c113 X-Archives-Hash: bc7c3fa7727b12d28d5b4ced654ebe8a --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02 Jun 2015 16:49, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 02/06/15 16:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > but yeah, I don't see a problem in dropping them=20 > > yeah especially since gkeys is not 3.2 capable=20 > > and I'm starting to integrate it in portage > > those pythons are ancient > > OK. Go for it. i shall do so in a day or two in case there are any 11th hour posters. and to make sure i'm not misrepresenting Brian/Zac. -mike --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVbcy5AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBp2sQAMOxZ3p0Wg6JgDNfQ8cbjcWC zVdowUwIjJ83S2T+XpZnByg1NVbatGHLCSW71xsmbLDPaxsw/JrwdyqHQe9yqSLR h3ArbrbVzzUK8+zK7v8ZlQcqOT8asKPV0R9Nf22DdOdi1FPToE0uGVLxPXH/kLOG aWSqg6L/tMdYCEspFQHKbTW47MYsm3MEvk64duND4mdnmdPCHgarFElol7D4Mb2u zXbsxDfQLvUKsXuG1GK81JtxwK0X9JT+RM9yvpD14m979BiMqHsmqLKN7CjIHUIu ejqWwDZa5WzklA8DiYbiSFd6BzS79R4Gz/34paB81ZwfT7VFIC/uw4Uo0s0DvuMh /wh6tA1MkaTxWN2ZDe4/L1gquN162Dt2VB/jzWs+jegHu8xP2l40RwmjCWZyBXkb puXVOy0FW0Y1pkzvJbkriL+GEJAQCtoJlICp7XtlD84WC6CoC8ZWr04YG1edmZt9 TnV4E+7VBkZqyjRtkq6BQB9Z3rEFP+6mEuqANNm8Bsh/g8wgFdUGuxSHYF7sVADC RXppnWOKd5NurPf5uM5keLo2fXuJPjMbkCAqtSQyGcPXFgcif0DBvkww4PlOuvHf 7nICEMvVhZy6wPtt0rbMoI8nEfe2V3lEPPOhHKfYKRBdWMKfvGoPfHo8wkAOSK3P W31cr2Qmbk/+tU+UhHKH =iOyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp--