[gentoo-portage-dev] Up the email communication!

[gentoo-portage-dev] Up the email communication!

[Alexander Berntsen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Friends,

It would be advantageous (to me at least!) if you could make sure to
email the list with your patch ACKs and comments. Even if you do it on
IRC in the first place, please send an email to the list as well.

I often read email and review patches on a bus or plane -- pulling git
to check commits and their messages might not be an option for me.

Thanks.
- -- 
Alexander
bernalex@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=bMAj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Up the email communication!

[Brian Dolbec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:15:09 +0200
Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Friends,
> 
> It would be advantageous (to me at least!) if you could make sure to
> email the list with your patch ACKs and comments. Even if you do it on
> IRC in the first place, please send an email to the list as well.
> 
> I often read email and review patches on a bus or plane -- pulling git
> to check commits and their messages might not be an option for me.
> 
> Thanks.
> - -- 
> Alexander
> bernalex@gentoo.org
> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVbMtcAAoJENQqWdRUGk8B8XIP/3Kujocynr7AZnM7srDydBGy
> /tOV8hTKAn3uJECgjY5gPjJ8xmqRqdKo6CDMeaHnLp99NcBzWh22uclNyAVcbNBV
> NN3JIwpnqSECSjBZgAtzA+jx7AMy3y1RMSlzsHLEXrcCi/gYnFaVrTNH7Spksban
> EtYil5TQdZhaUe9LDcOqLFW+Uqb1vhcTg4EurZT9BOwlLfs0cPcwRQLuURYR0F/5
> 44cGehxES8LtOvF53SwKOJuPCOCqLMIpAmieWupAQ0OIUzKXdXw7vMNbB6HcfY2K
> XFVb4EfSXdqA+MA1HVjzoMhSkjJ8D57VaplmjMYSntwAZW88ru99w2qrMQqemXSs
> Ys2Bx8jFCI1MU24KtNvQlL1znNlHemiMxR6AovGYPbUaqzJT+rGqxsi4rCHQQiMO
> COdi92r4UOWw8gwKsYmGoChzgeEaiUzmwoeyj98ArQx68xU8dYOthUCZxLcHg4gP
> Dcp+bVO2NQBLLyZyjqvdC5UaAUNHx+s9ziNzb9c7sTg4unj0qX5f/2FFa0TKU8tj
> OWgWQAkpsZbVQq1aeW2E+3Uc/ttB4kt3neA5x+WxDtoMRVZYwalk9sK8RXam7LkE
> BRPcSxxsoTY4MYpAzbmLCLMmQp0ksz4Q4mNB/bsBaWzQYWviRSY6xNsSvYHcf4ur
> AWA+iabRFSU84L/4eA2S
> =bMAj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

sorry, my bad :/

- -- 
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1
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=JJN7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Up the email communication!

[Duncan]

Alexander Berntsen posted on Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:15:09 +0200 as excerpted:

> Friends,
> 
> It would be advantageous

[TLDR summary: Agree with the point but nearly deleted as spam.]

At that point I was double-checking for spam:

1) Vague, spammy, subject.

2) Vague, almost too formally "collegial" "Friends" greeting.

3) "It would be advantageous"?  In a non-spam mail?  Don't see /that/ 
sort of formal "distant" wording very often... except in spam!  But maybe 
my mailing circle is significantly different than yours. <shrug>

On the counter-spam side, how many spammers would be (true or fake)
gpg-signing?  I've learned to ignore that for quick reads (tho could of 
course verify if I needed to and thus appreciate the value), but saw it 
once I was second-looking, and that was enough to convince me to read 
further, at which point I saw that the mail was legit.

On topic, meanwhile, not that a non-dev opinion counts for too much, but 
FWIW, agreed with the point. I don't do IRC so seeing the acks, etc, on-
list, would make it easier for me to follow too.  =:^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman