From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84297138CCF for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 23:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D42BE08C5; Thu, 14 May 2015 23:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2F4E08C1 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 23:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56E68340D46 for ; Thu, 14 May 2015 23:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:01:46 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] config: skip missing profiles/repo_name warning when using layout.conf:repo-name Message-ID: <20150514230146.GE27613@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1431600642-13750-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20150514114353.3c6b1572.dolsen@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150514114353.3c6b1572.dolsen@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5e0d537e-ea81-469f-9f39-992cb150e3ae X-Archives-Hash: 83fe03068e6cce279e6794c6b03899a0 --y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14 May 2015 11:43, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2015 06:50:42 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The repo name is considered missing if there is no explicit > > "repo_name" file. But if it's set in layout.conf via repo-name, we > > can skip that. Otherwise we end up with copy & paste spew. >=20 > Yeah, merge please >=20 > Wasn't there a bug for this? If there is pleas add the bug # to the > commit message i'm not seeing one ... searched for "repo-name" and "repo_name" ... -mike --y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVVSlaAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBmLkQAI3S4vePAFm5JvpNBBVqwk38 +Qf20r2DuagAI2FWVcXzbZIlq1MjY1CaNXj2NiL2ve/zOIU26D+AFLqM2YBUU84C oecnpjKYUB5HbHXhcPIta0mcTq2HB9MmHqA8l3Rkast7kdvEICc5Hs31K/9I7jWr HI3kVXBkoUVXOyvwHcCOCklPY8qkt9hTJ8Vha01CPbwElRogtXWGsbM0taxlyaIf 5Txdc0UZFfmA2FJfftzzE4HLfX0yJWMwV8uePpaEbep67539G5kxkI2kCRUUqOla MlAthyINW0C2pcq/sNCFLFe5uZGZ/2E5sExDBzYEnhgGtwh5whFBmV9f50y3104z CeYYT4xHpgqawPMtwjH92lcZafJIrNx45bNDT1zjF6C8AtVuVf/BTL7SA5tWXvoV jv0BTlvy2U/plfxFlVRkszegVZo0qYll2TrrstbXodZ7B1cSwSJrvHLI1tYxxWZS arIh3goM3FFBBEOOv7ni9Ae1awLkDxFn6Wwt36iHK5LgFb2JH2EdTBvu03Tv4r6p fpkL4rtZGJeEtki1B2TEVyxKX9O9SFvWiJL9wo851afRr4mUTW0IO4K6asNaHqhb bBkIWRwQz8GbaUThguAByf4WTovGTxFPluFLKkGtPlZ/iGcuU+mV0PovNIxP7etw dsSFHGcWWmr2TBcGr++6 =DliA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG--