From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B969138A1A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D02EBE086D; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 561D7E086C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (mgorny-1-pt.tunnel.tserv28.waw1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:70:353::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 290D6340675; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:34:43 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Zac Medico Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org, robbat2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Allow virtuals in package.provided Message-ID: <20150112103443.0a0bf6e0@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <5483F44E.3080000@gentoo.org> References: <1417797794-19449-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <5483F44E.3080000@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/tPHLkNkOr38CDsYR1qqA/2o"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0ee03051-0fa7-41e6-9650-19a3cd89367e X-Archives-Hash: 24778e8f88f2302f6d42933f39cc12d3 --Sig_/tPHLkNkOr38CDsYR1qqA/2o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-12-06, o godz. 22:31:42 Zac Medico napisa=C5=82(a): > @Robin: This patch reverts the changes from bug 161003. Maybe this > constraint is not needed anymore? Considering the feedback on the bug, ok to push this one finally? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/tPHLkNkOr38CDsYR1qqA/2o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUs5U3XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOM3gP/1S5ENIICEpwh/9GnWc5E5oX paQm8PY6cSrlM5wuV5jYf3Jm1gKGoKv8SQAdHYNf/oL/ypwjicoRNJDivwY+VZIz fRhgmo5GhYz3YPrjRaJgJHaNLO+6R6vIF2x7r6Qpv6oi0fCC1D9oZWd6uDAETuO+ 9cArvlPKqU10dVWJ+jFmm8fNuQrE+Q4TFsh4bVog5U4OUslCzTL4iaUV8+CZ3kRS 9+JakTIBTY2zKjgfE5S0kuQqEjHwulWRUKRnmyhFbn0mY/taK+1GsOzpVSanfSam QCf7YHA4sG0jNBWXgWqfzZ+/cstaS3cH8su1vOAv3VYtwuK4F9NPFqiyItfm6k0w KR+4FVtRhDQ3HDu9Cxts+c4n7AKZFUh29A0SkS1kus5fsnTNSFm301leBRO2zpYN 3EH7FMZwnWdkIe0dBuOAhUQ5VfQN2yUAL083hiiU+L2vwg+Sj+l6FhzROQioL81/ SSkBFs9xP+sfLGDtcResCp9nSB04X31ooz76O/XrSZS4ziqSCfXKNxboscjocjd2 SpBV/AO7aMbD6i4u8DJJYgdLgfHDYrfLAYYJu2eM3mvqRtieM08SESnRQFi/gFKp fgbb2cD5O74d88CkV/WlLpcsvaUYpznpQL0ZBy6B1GwloBTEeK0uHGMB7vfr8E8z /WGP3u3t7vLf0VbSOUEU =jh3O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tPHLkNkOr38CDsYR1qqA/2o--