Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes

[Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:06:59 +0200
Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@gentoo.org> wrote:
 
> Evidently Michał was a bit sceptical. And anyway, I don't care too
> much about these patches any longer. Maybe it comes with raising in
> the ranks, but 2014 me is not particularly sympathetic of 2013 me and
> his stupid patches. These days I just prefer fixing bugs and not
> changing anything.
> 
> So on that note, if nobody objects, I suggest we just ignore the
> autounmask refactor altogether. Instead I'll just make the actual
> bugfix (make --ask imply --autounmask-write) a standalone patch which
> I'll submit to the list. Sounds good to everyone?
> - -- 
> Alexander
> bernalex@gentoo.org


Actually, re-reading your patches again, your patches actually made
more sense to me finally.  You were fixing it to make implied
behavior the actual behavior.  So while I was originally objecting to
them, then was not opposing them (last time we discussed inclusion), I
now see them much clearer and agree with them.

The --ask implying --autounmask-write is something people would not
object to so strongly like they did to your original patchset. 

- -- 
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=
=2Pok
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----