From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372ED1387AB for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73BECE0A95; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4103E0A92 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from big_daddy.dol-sen.ca (S010600222de111ff.vc.shawcable.net [96.49.5.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED8333F9C3 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:26:42 -0800 From: Brian Dolbec To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New Portage release Message-ID: <20140208102642.0935767d@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> In-Reply-To: <20140208090315.GP70664@gentoo.org> References: <20140208090315.GP70664@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/lYf42fI+75/B_1YizEVpw0G"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d8a6feed-4dfd-4218-893c-2fc077dbffa3 X-Archives-Hash: 06abdf9280edf109c50f37e65e9cb1f1 --Sig_/lYf42fI+75/B_1YizEVpw0G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:03:15 +0100 Fabian Groffen wrote: > Hey all, >=20 > I'm sorry if this has been discussed previously. I admit not having > read all of the mails on this list recently. >=20 > Long story short: what are the plans on releasing 2.2.9? >=20 > Longer version: for Prefix I likely need a new release soon to get > some fixes out of the door. Since I like to stay on par with mainline > portage's versioning here, I've been going along with mainline > portage's releases for a while, which worked fine. Now we haven't > got a release for a long while, what's the plans here? Is there > anyone at all who can/dares to spin a release? >=20 > Apologies in advance if this has been discussed recently. >=20 > Thanks, > Fabian >=20 I hadn't thought about 2.2.9 just yet. We are having a meeting tomorrow at Feb. 9, 19:00 UTC in #gentoo-meetings, join us and we can discuss it more with the others. There have been a few bug fixes, but I don't know if there is some others that should be dealt with before a 2.2.9 release. If you can't attend the meeting, at least I will have a better idea of when we will be able to do a release. --=20 Brian Dolbec --Sig_/lYf42fI+75/B_1YizEVpw0G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJS9nbjXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4Njg4RkQxQ0M3MUMxQzA0RUFFQTQyMzcy MjE0RDkwQTAxNEYxN0NCAAoJECIU2QoBTxfLyIIIAKpMiqMJ1FR0EgJzjYBAHoGM j+7kjtHlD8Fa/8pO45Hu5TcOuTyP8/Zs6350j1McdZaJoiw+Kpvxkq3aRvh1y+O5 Ni68FxrSAh4nSRM+1+PUXHef6l3ritlBoo/mlWXvxsoW/lp44e61RPk3RApO9Ro4 gpUuWNTi0P/1wNdcAe3FOX3CaodgvBqkXbicM1Yz5XjvnPco0u3bqYZI4cLEE5n6 1rq5VOWJF+1MlGc1qu5SiqVl8xDaLINu+u6NgscJimgTyLX38Dx+7Yl/+UrPANHz gu1uAChojyUBjPj3pzfXgpWTOHwcV3E3VoEEkSqjH9OZlidsG5orG+9VXy7hgaI= =pJlY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/lYf42fI+75/B_1YizEVpw0G--