Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] Test for read-only filesystems, bail out during preinst if there are any which will be written to and display a useful error message. Fixes bug 378869.

[Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]

On Saturday 18 January 2014 21:00:48 Chris Reffett wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/pym/portage/util/rochecker.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +#-*- coding:utf-8 -*-
> +# Copyright 2014 Gentoo Foundation
> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> +"""
> +Methods to check whether Portage is going to write to read-only
> filesystems. +Since the methods are not portable across different OSes,
> each OS needs its +own method. To expand RO checking for different OSes,
> add a method which +accepts a list of directories and returns a list of
> mounts which need to be +remounted RW, then add "elif ostype == (the
> ostype value for your OS)" to

prefer OSes -> OS's

> +get_ro_checker()
> +"""

period at the end

> +def get_ro_checker():
> +	"""
> +	Uses the system type to find an appropriate method for testing whether
> Portage
> +	is going to write to any read-only filesystems
> +
> +	@return:
> +	1. A method for testing for RO filesystems appropriate to the current
> system
> +	"""

not a new issue, but we really need to get away from this style and use 
PEP257.  someone feel like fixing that in the code base ? :)

> +	if ostype == "Linux":
> +		return linux_ro_checker
> +	else:
> +		return empty_ro_checker

isn't this a glorified dict ?

_CHECKERS = {
	'Linux': linux_ro_checker,
}

def get_ro_checker()
	return _CHECKERS.get(ostype, empty_ro_checker)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]