From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BD138247 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 22:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 566DFE0BA9; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 22:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF134E0BA7 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 22:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C1E33F15B; Sun, 5 Jan 2014 22:21:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Document layout.conf more (bug 395359) Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 17:21:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Sebastian Luther References: <1388946063-3034-1-git-send-email-SebastianLuther@gmx.de> <201401051431.37369.vapier@gentoo.org> <52C9D23F.3000209@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <52C9D23F.3000209@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1522466.j8jDnCGocg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401051721.29854.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c73e80b7-b3ed-4899-93db-2657d0d7cc1a X-Archives-Hash: dd3d1ef00aae819ab5944db5c8d64191 --nextPart1522466.j8jDnCGocg Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 05 January 2014 16:44:31 Sebastian Luther wrote: > One thing about the 'profile-formats' key. >=20 > portage-1-compat is not a valid value (see _valid_profile_formats > variable), but pms is. >=20 > From the use in other places it seems that portage-1-compat is like > portage-1, but warns for incompatibilities with pms. portage-1-compat is used internally by portage, but you're right that it's = not=20 allowed to be set directly. i'll tweak the section a bit. =2Dmike --nextPart1522466.j8jDnCGocg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJSydrpAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBzeMQAKUmFDIItd3IDurOqOkuuO3Y 6bzpXG6OCQU5+fOGhF7bcHCdHXDkB6+9LAbaX6BbcPR8fUMp4QBP1LjyFCanKTsX JEjiiyIqU2x/GJD5pINS0ePtRDiGIluKbeR09JTKzHiRypepA/HrKLBOJs9jcM+r 7LDOvPWXDgt1Mphs9rGVi8f+NrgrxhHtj49G6wROkdjjYGIvBGjacTH2VnjXyKW4 Rqlb6x86C2C1UOwwajSgiIYwXbeBjMAtMpSonvaQ/7LjzVgtzEYsHXB7Hv+WX2Mv qY6AWzGSqNGtDb2B6SOmLQ+S8rVg5HThIS38snCgKHad7aBZLZvdHH7Xy0fidaUF TWxKXzHyvBMpie8VmPa9KI4zyTk+edUrq0VujLKr0yZG5TuLHWOZTAiJSdl4/2Jb pa/jhhKEALpVIL+TmcYQviMml8swUh0DEvlzYrr2BBKxsdWEgj8hZMb2RevCBl9o rlU4fraQLlviugFVVB0uLtnpzRq2chThfGJTS2fhQh2ZsQZrqoRZFBaM+9KD8/9h MIDi6RplBODPKQ76t14PP/+m9jz4DWeVl9eB32VlFeyafVrsXySVZX6WMi2ffriL 0chhcaoNKSY6ebkcmz1B6bF8uZ078dtCv9gUAmynO9W3WnsgWjK/osXfbGjzPa+Q xYipLKrZIkLLqFzc2LRU =aoLo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1522466.j8jDnCGocg--