From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1F3138247 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08A79E0957; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77BF1E0944 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F1233F6CE; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:03:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New portage version with latest fixes in git is needed Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:03:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Brian Dolbec References: <1388845695.934.1.camel@belkin5> <1388847388.3715.2.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> In-Reply-To: <1388847388.3715.2.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2367630.lOxulq67VV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401041003.21303.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f8e5af18-554e-4206-a890-9f74dbe4f108 X-Archives-Hash: e31f2da6e561cd4c1748463e8c2fc045 --nextPart2367630.lOxulq67VV Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 04 January 2014 09:56:28 Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed) > > to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of them > > important like: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D490362 > >=20 > > Not sure if I can contribute with something on this, but if you thing > > so, please let me know >=20 > Yes, I planned to get it out this weekend, if all goes well. >=20 > There are one or two more patches to apply. Then I'll start packaging > it. >=20 > Is everyone else in agreement? we should document the release process. ideally, it should be as simple as: make dist PV=3D2.1.8 and even: make distcheck PV=3D2.1.8 =2Dmike --nextPart2367630.lOxulq67VV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJSyCK5AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB6KQP/ixnZsIkN1rQ6Gy245POksC6 XcFvJBZ2Kd60ytgXtZMApdMMdK/xnHLMyb3GYi8X9t/raNLFJszc/IlLnhXqxQrF +JYTToBmvEnRnRK+HfNlB6Gq/iq9XCAsEdTpF2DJmyFwULuargyUYyt4FZ1P8fgC XVz6ti3USOS5vPmRc7zLbMBhiADH+Ja/HJ8XfXJNFmFep31nhxwORFl7bylyzPkK cWpEU8ZbCT/P1U6qRChGWTas2PhFgDMt2lkoq3nNOA+04oBU9C47slw709ROxZkT ReJ/47OT7U2c+fJKQyEr9pgI+Epicrha+YOquEpzTDVlvm7vL2NYPcdA1hEYrcSv vaZjaC6n+0TW4hZTVWwXGUNecFHB7Jp6CsmlHh8RZxrMKkgqQqiitPtl0UupojGN pPsM7XLx0z//n1OYGpoYSMxu3RL4sHId2jj8q3tNfAJIxf0HPZrdhtmnDN1Rl8Hx 09qgIT96w1coxkDCjhFDKB61eFIp3kWOreTrHNzY6PS3YfMHr/v2NuQxYNOWrUqQ bpyrxLiGuDYNWKQLjHnrI+Yk4QbfGgvOlAR5FCcB0CYewjksCkUycgg4S/lv4p+D tA6btvVEds4rpWloUlLjU6ZTvXbhcXlqDq2v6MjweIkXha2te2iH5f9Ja4WKp3cu UZ2ao10jGRHVd0gwspSE =Lsyt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2367630.lOxulq67VV--