[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: app-shells/gentoo-bashcomp needs some portage expert lovin'

[Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1591 bytes --]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:

> Could a number of folks familiar with both portage AND bash completion
> help out the shell-tools herd (no specific maintainer specified in
> metadata) with app-shell/gentoo-bashcomp bugs?
> 
> It seems to have accumulated quite a number (13) of portage-completion
> (and gentoolkit-completion) related bugs, including bug #424777 filed on
> July 4th by jer, mentioning that it it breaks with make.conf in /etc/
> portage, which is kinda critical right about now. =:^(
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424777
> 
> And here's the list of all open bugs for it.  As you can see if you look,
> all or nearly all of the currently 13 open bugs are portage or gentoolkit
> related, and it really looks like the package could use some help from
> those who know those tools.
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=app-shells%2Fgentoo-bashcomp
> 
> (I said on the devlist thread I'd report bugs, but this one's been open
> for over two months and is directly related to the make.conf move, so it's
> a big one, simple fix proposed, but no actual fixes in-tree yet, plus
> seeing all those others related to portage and gentoolkit, thus the
> request here.)

I was planning on working on this.  I just need to get off my butt and find
someone to give me write access to the overlay.


-- 
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets          we were never more here, expanse getting broader
@ gentoo.org                          but bigger boats been done by less water

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]