From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LiiWv-00086t-Ak for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F2BFE021D; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F74E021D for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D795F641EB for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.49 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.49 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5WIrNo2KpeQZ for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA9E641F1 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LiiWV-00058V-Nj for gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:31 +0000 Received: from s0106001f3b27dbf9.mj.shawcable.net ([70.64.208.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:31 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by s0106001f3b27dbf9.mj.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:04:31 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: %n in writable segment detected ?? Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:05:41 -0600 Message-ID: <20090314230541.4de94192@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/dXc7AmFAB8I_JlQumqh/cgs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106001f3b27dbf9.mj.shawcable.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 1da3d37d-c2c3-4213-8c9f-6641ba9eebae X-Archives-Hash: 05b6339fc539a697a68f5c7ffe473ad5 --Sig_/dXc7AmFAB8I_JlQumqh/cgs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > What's the below "%n in writable segment detected" bit all about? > Should I worry about it? I saw it once before but have no clue > whether it's portage/emerge itself outputting it (I would guess yes, > QA warning??), or one of the build processes. >=20 > I'm guessing it's a warning from portage's newer parallel jobs > processing that you guys may be interested in (a bug to trace down? > file it?? any other info beyond the below that would be useful? how > to duplicate? etc.) but don't know and obviously haven't the foggiest > how serious it is. But it didn't cause anything to barf, so I > figured it couldn't be too bad. But it's still worrying not knowing > what it is, when it's obviously important enough to break the > parallel jobs enforced backgrounding. >=20 > ~amd64/2008.0/no-multilib, portage-2.2_rc25 (now, previously with a=20 > different _rc) >=20 > Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests > >>> Starting parallel fetch > >>> Emerging (1 of 5) sys-devel/gnuconfig-20090203 > >>> Emerging (2 of 5) sys-apps/sandbox-1.6 > >>> Installing sys-devel/gnuconfig-20090203 > >>> Installing sys-apps/sandbox-1.6 > >>> Emerging (3 of 5) sys-fs/udev-140 > >>> Emerging (4 of 5) sys-apps/coreutils-7.1 > >>> Jobs: 2 of 5 complete, 1 running Load avg: 4.81, > >>> 3.95,=20 > 2.11*** %n in writable segment detected *** >=20 > Thanks! http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257279 --=20 gcc-porting, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257279 by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/dXc7AmFAB8I_JlQumqh/cgs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm8jK4ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmIP/QCfXfyDA3XZ3k3QqcEQRIE1Z4ng oNMAoLRMi9QRyobusDTjt8g3/fGxfXkD =18Kn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dXc7AmFAB8I_JlQumqh/cgs--