From: felix@crowfix.com
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:50:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314145006.GA24554@crowfix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4416A4C1.6090903@gentoo.org>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:10:57PM +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
> tvali wrote:
> >* When updating or installing new package, if something goes wrong,
> >still emerge other packages, which havent failed packages as
> >dependencies -- in my case, for example, when i do --update, for
> >example, then the fact that update of first package fails does not
> >definitely mean that i dont want to update others
> --resume
No, make -k. At least that's what I would dearly like to see.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 11:02 [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better tvali
2006-03-14 11:10 ` Simon Stelling
2006-03-14 11:24 ` tvali
2006-03-14 11:53 ` tvali
2006-03-14 12:14 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:19 ` Devon Miller
2006-03-14 13:25 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:50 ` tvali
2006-03-14 14:33 ` tvali
2006-03-14 15:04 ` Brian
2006-03-14 15:32 ` tvali
2006-03-14 16:21 ` Brian
2006-03-15 0:33 ` esearch integration [was Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better] Brian Harring
2006-03-15 14:20 ` tvali
2006-03-15 14:21 ` tvali
2006-03-15 0:37 ` sync suggestions " Brian Harring
2006-03-15 14:18 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:21 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better tvali
2006-03-14 13:35 ` Marius Mauch
2006-03-14 14:52 ` tvali
2006-03-15 0:29 ` sql based cache [was Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better] Brian Harring
2006-03-14 14:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better Alec Warner
2006-03-14 15:03 ` tvali
2006-03-14 15:53 ` Johannes Fahrenkrug
2006-03-14 16:24 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:50 ` Marius Mauch
2006-03-14 15:18 ` solar
2006-03-14 16:35 ` tvali
2006-03-14 18:26 ` tvali
2006-03-14 18:30 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-03-14 18:46 ` tvali
2006-03-14 18:49 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-03-14 14:50 ` felix [this message]
2006-03-14 13:44 ` Marius Mauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314145006.GA24554@crowfix.com \
--to=felix@crowfix.com \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox