From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [5/7] portage_exec cleanups
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:28:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051029172817.GQ24883@nightcrawler> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510300220.02458.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 719 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:20:02AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Trying to alter patches that have been split up is a PITA. Missed a var rename
> in the patch just sent. :/
Heh, nice timing on the max_fd_limit, beat me in sending it by 46
seconds :)
Personally... for a change like what you're introducing into
portage_exec, I prefer a single patch.
Chunked patched make sense depending on a somewhat subjective
grouping; in this case, familiar with the underlying code so
interpretting it all is possible, but if it were any other source I
would've resorted to applying the series, then diffing between svn and
the changes.
Your call really, since you're generating the patch(es).
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-29 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-23 6:45 [gentoo-portage-dev] [Bug 104705] emerge doesn't print complete error message Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 10:34 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [0/7] portage_exec cleanups (WAS: [Bug 104705] emerge doesn't print complete error message) Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 10:41 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [1/7] portage_exec cleanups Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 10:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [2/7] " Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 10:49 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [3/7] " Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 14:22 ` Brian Harring
2005-10-29 15:06 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 15:17 ` Brian Harring
2005-10-29 10:52 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [4/7] " Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 11:03 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 10:56 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [5/7] " Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 15:25 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 16:04 ` Brian Harring
2005-10-29 16:40 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 17:17 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 17:17 ` Brian Harring
2005-10-29 17:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 17:20 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 17:28 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2005-10-29 10:57 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [6/7] " Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 11:01 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [7/7] " Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 17:32 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] [0/7] portage_exec cleanups (WAS: [Bug 104705] emerge doesn't print complete error message) Jason Stubbs
2005-10-29 17:38 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-10-30 7:03 ` Jason Stubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051029172817.GQ24883@nightcrawler \
--to=ferringb@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox