From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENUXh-00022r-VO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:08:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j96Bx5RY003426; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:59:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j96Bx4u0026902 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:59:05 GMT Received: from zh034158.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.3.34.158] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ENUXE-0006ru-Ff for gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:07:40 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C0D8248BE1; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:08:13 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID... Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:08:13 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.91 References: <20051005234046.GG13519@nightcrawler> <20051006023948.GQ13519@nightcrawler> <20051006125144.03a2527d@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051006125144.03a2527d@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510062108.13366.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3fe40d6d-b71b-4015-9ec5-d92dd01fd45c X-Archives-Hash: 34384eb00f8b00dd7b19dde2f012a919 On Thursday 06 October 2005 20:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:39:49 -0500 Brian Harring > > wrote: > | So bluntly, shut up and let those who you think are being retarded, > | be retarded. Discussions on this list regarding those attempts > | shouldn't be heckled unless you're contributing to those efforts (and > | I truly mean *contributing*, not trying to punch holes in embryonic > | efforts that are trying to get off the ground addressing the major > | issues up front). > > Pfff. By contributing to the design by showing what *won't* work, I'm > saving a heck of a lot of wasted man hours that will otherwise be spent > writing a non-working solution. I must admit that I've simply ignored this thread for the most part, but glancing through your emails I can't find any list of reasons why it won't work. I can only find statements that it won't work and that the creative process should follow a different path (=plan everything first). -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list