From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENIaO-0003hD-UA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:22:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j95ND9AR016141; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:13:09 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j95ND8Dj010714 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:13:08 GMT Received: from cpe-65-26-255-237.wi.res.rr.com ([65.26.255.237] helo=nightcrawler) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ENIZv-0000t3-C0 for gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:21:39 +0000 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:21:48 -0500 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID... Message-ID: <20051005232147.GD13519@nightcrawler> References: <43443257.8090800@egr.msu.edu> <20051005202429.GC10159@nightcrawler> <20051005215703.73327655@snowdrop.home> <20051005232956.14af09fc@snowdrop.home> <20051005225336.GJ10159@nightcrawler> <20051006000318.77ed8757@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051006000318.77ed8757@snowdrop.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: cff7401c-0064-4e26-b865-9528df49f08c X-Archives-Hash: 3422c41caa43add7b14028dbe27fd0b8 --+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 12:03:18AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:53:36 -0500 Brian Harring > wrote: > | On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 11:29:56PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 16:16:06 -0500 Kito wrote: > | > | > b) assume that you'll not have to modify ebuilds > | > |=20 > | > | I don't think anyone(devs) has made this naive assumption have > | > | they? > | >=20 > | > pvdabeel has for pathspec. > | >=20 > | > | > and c) > | > | > demand that as soon as it's available, it works for all ebuilds. > | > |=20 > | > | I don't think anyone(devs) has made this naive demand have they? > | >=20 > | > pvdabeel has for pathspec. > |=20 > | You're not talking to pvdabeel right now, so kindly be quiet about=20 > | him. >=20 > Oh come off it. You claim that no dev has made this naive demand when > at least one quite clearly has on several occasions. All three of my > points are entirely relevant to the discussion, since every other time > this has come up at least one said mistakes has been made. Again, do you see anyone here claiming all are simple? It's the same=20 points made last time around, those who want it do the work, it's=20 going to be bumpy and will require work, but those who want it are the=20 ones who have to do it. Bluntly, stick to the discussion of prefix, or go elsewhere. Bash=20 pvdabeel if you like but sure as hell not on this list since no one=20 cares, further since it's not relevant to the _current_ discussion,=20 where people are actually attempting to pull this off. If as you posit, it's not been discussed/planned properly, I suggest=20 you stick to contributing to the discussion and planning of it. The=20 alternative is that people get fed up with the the ancillary bullshit,=20 and they implement it themselves (which I'm sure you would dislike). ~harring --+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRGALvdBxRoA3VU0RAk72AKDfmt5e8+gpR1wWJ2HgPqrnKyccLwCfZVLk v/iU4yd2NIzpwcgvkkt6JhI= =crZ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+KJYzRxRHjYqLGl5-- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list