From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8MNx-0006hE-7b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:23:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7PIL9Vc001420; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:21:09 GMT Received: from caine.easynet.fr (smarthost165.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.165]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7PIL9up013245 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:21:09 GMT Received: from easyconnect2121138-64.clients.easynet.fr ([212.11.38.64] helo=eusebe) by caine.easynet.fr with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1E8MMp-0002cw-W6 for gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:22:24 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:22:05 +0200 From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Additional information to output: emerge -pv Message-ID: <20050825202205.3f9c46d4@eusebe> In-Reply-To: <430E05CC.8050000@wmich.edu> References: <430E05CC.8050000@wmich.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 50c62a04-5cf9-4517-8f7e-62c770c6b914 X-Archives-Hash: cc90773946f6f9eeef056c3a169b688a On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:54:20 -0400 Dustin Spicuzza wrote: > > The appropriate way would be to open a bug in bugzilla, assign > > it to the portage team and attach the patch there (normally > > each file separately, not packed in a tarball) > > Thanks. Will do. May be a duplicate of bug #84884 though, which has, among other things, a patch for emerge (2.0.51.x too) similar in purpose to what you are proposing (although there are some cosmetic differences, like option name or the info being summarized at the end instead of being displayed per package): https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 Btw, there was not much feedback on that one... would someone be interested if i port it to CVS HEAD? As far as i remember, it should be pretty easy, although the emerge patch has to be rewritten. -- TGL. -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list