From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7Ky5-0005S4-9R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:40:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7MMdBsa009201; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:39:11 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7MMdAYx000779; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:39:11 GMT Received: from cpe-65-26-255-237.wi.res.rr.com ([65.26.255.237] helo=nightcrawler) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1E7KxQ-0005ph-Jc; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:39:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:38:49 -0500 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] stripping implementation in portage Message-ID: <20050822223849.GW10816@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: d5381691-5b19-4eab-a6e4-f2f87e900266 X-Archives-Hash: 7907783974aa5579f244a8e20c380226 --0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hola all. Short version, the nostrip feature is a bit funky as an option. What=20 I'm after is effectively building all packages *with* debugging=20 information as default, and leaving it up to the repository you're=20 merging the package to, to decide on stripping or not. IOW, if you prefer stripped binaries on your livefs, the stripping occurs= =20 while merging to the livefs- this leaves you the option=20 of having binpkgs that *do* carry non-stripped binaries/libs. =20 Situation can be reversed also, for the embedded crowd. Downside, for people who flat out want stripping across the board,=20 it's a bit more flipping it on, although that's addressed via inherit=20 support within the underlying config (just take my word on that one :) Also involves a bit more logic, but that's just implementation voodoo. So... thoughts? I'd be particularly curious about any package where=20 this wouldn't be viable. Aside from that, cc'ing both lists, would prefer the discussion on dev=20 since the implementation can go either way; preference of if that=20 flexibility is desired or not is a user thing, so we discuss it in=20 their ml. ~harring --0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDClP5vdBxRoA3VU0RArNFAKClymbsJaIXkhkjqia+G9JEb7PYRwCfYhfq 8+CSPHlivIRcBgXURaXj0Es= =tbcS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0XMZdl/q8hSSmFeD-- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list