From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7K4P-0000ZL-BM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:43:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7MLfMnr024790; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:22 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7MLfLWs027518 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:22 GMT Received: from cpe-65-26-255-237.wi.res.rr.com ([65.26.255.237] helo=nightcrawler) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1E7K3T-0008NL-3k for gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:42:07 +0000 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:40:59 -0500 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Environment Whitelisting Message-ID: <20050822214059.GU10816@nightcrawler> References: <4308E349.8010107@egr.msu.edu> <20050822233323.276ad887@andy.genone.homeip.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050822233323.276ad887@andy.genone.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: c0779fe7-f328-43a4-bc89-f70aadbd3cd2 X-Archives-Hash: e4e249b7929679e9cff676ee96beebf7 --HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:33:23PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > Theoretical discussions about this are pointless IMO without > numbers/facts to back things up. I'd posit theroetical discussions about this are pointless without=20 getting ebuild dev's to give a yay/nay on whether they want it or not;=20 not much for trying to force it down their throats if they don't want=20 it (more work, essentially). ~harring --HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDCkZrvdBxRoA3VU0RApOXAKC7scLAIJH8CvVj5DYtKK6ZfeoeswCfWprR z3ZXx3DsvKiULVDoAXzjRlM= =kqHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HB4mHL4PVvkpZAgW-- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list