From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3HCP-0008Ku-Bu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:50:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BHn51w013502; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:49:05 GMT Received: from darwin.irclog.de (darwin.irclog.de [212.227.38.129]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BHn4rq022163 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:49:04 GMT Received: (qmail 16572 invoked by uid 210); 11 Aug 2005 20:37:33 +0200 Received: from 84.153.59.239 by darwin (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.85.1/1011. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(84.153.59.239):SA:0(0.2/5.0):. Processed in 1.024759 secs); 11 Aug 2005 18:37:33 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 Received: from p54993bef.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO tesla) (chkorn-send@chkorn.de@84.153.59.239) by darwin.irclog.de with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Aug 2005 20:37:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:51:49 +0200 From: Christopher Korn To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: warnera6@egr.msu.edu Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Next major version Message-Id: <20050811195149.4957adf5.chris@chkorn.de> In-Reply-To: <42FA540E.2080900@egr.msu.edu> References: <1123700491.29247.56.camel@localhost> <42FA540E.2080900@egr.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0rc (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 216535ac-125c-4397-a74c-b045a0ef0f46 X-Archives-Hash: e6356f8296874f688382c3e5864f8c35 > > Hi Jason and other folks, > > I saw your last comment on > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 about most the these > > feature to be present in the next major version. That is really > > great to read. > > > > On that subject, I'd like to have an idea about when we should > > expect that next version. > > > > That said, I think it would be helpful to have a portage developper > > site. Perhaps there is and I dont know... > That would require someone writing one, so if you are > volunteering ;) Writing is not the problem. But without (proper) information it is hard to write a documentation or something like this. Chris -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list