On Monday 18 July 2005 14:05, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:06 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > The
> > reason is that I'd like a second pair of eyes to look
>
> Personally, I prefer the kernel's method of handling this (which is
> also what I use for my own development). A highly detailed,
> automated changelog with non-binary file differentials is quite
> useful for people that want to monitor the code.

I have no idea what you are saying here.

> > From now on, I'll be posting everything that I am thinking of
> > pushing into stable (portage-2.0) and would like it if people
> > could look over the patches and respond with a yay or nay.
>
> In the future, it might be helpful to post those patches in-line,
> along with the message. That way no-one needs to open a separate
> program to view the changes.

I thought about that, but line-wrapping and python's severe reliance 
on whitespace kind of makes that difficult.

-- 
Jason Stubbs