On Sunday 12 June 2005 02:09, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Sunday 12 June 2005 00:34, Brian wrote:
> > Am I correct in that the imported instance of portage was still using
> > the old metadata cache at the time of import? Even though the cache was
> > updated at the end of the sync.  After a sync we should re-initialize
> > our instance of portage for it to use the new cache?
>
> Correct. I'm not sure what will happen in the future, but adding checks for
> this into the current design will noticably slow down the general case
> (where the cache isn't changed by external processes).

Incorrect. I checked the code rather than making assumptions and found that it 
is going to disk everytime already - at least in the case of the default flat 
files.

Regards,
Jason Stubbs