From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16357 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 19:33:38 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 19:33:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CYUni-0006b8-Mr for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:33:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 11932 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2004 19:33:37 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12954 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 19:33:37 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:33:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20041127232254.GA358@halffull.org> <20041128002838.57c9ea59@snowdrop.home> <200411281248.38779.trapni@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200411281248.38779.trapni@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1989502.IxaC9VGVD8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411282033.41240.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Disabling "strip" in Emerge X-Archives-Salt: b8097ff4-7714-43bd-94ba-2c7fe57cd59d X-Archives-Hash: 30603957cbd708add4b0269e19c04193 --nextPart1989502.IxaC9VGVD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 28 November 2004 12:48, Christian Parpart wrote: > On Sunday 28 November 2004 1:28 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:24:44 -0800 (PST) Sorav Bansal > > > > wrote: > > | Hence, any project that calls install -s will be troublesome for me. > > | Anyways, I really appreciate your help. In case you have any > > | suggestions on how to get around the install -s problem, that would be > > | great! > > > > As I recall from when we first started messing around with cross > > compiling (we couldn't get strip to work...) the easiest way is to make > > strip a symlink to /bin/true... > > OTOH, it shall be possible to provide a new eclass function (maybe execut= ed > by default) that modifies each existing Makefile that strips out all -s > right behind "install" commands. Just like done with strip-flags for > C[XX]FLAGS. > > That impossible? Well, allmost. Maybe a good option would be to write an install wrapper, an= d=20 add it to a portage private directory that gets prepended to the path. This= =20 install wrapper would strip the -s part from the install command if nostrip= =20 is in FEATURES. You can even do this with /etc/portage/bashrc ;-) Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1989502.IxaC9VGVD8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBqigVbKx5DBjWFdsRArAAAKCRdJQV8GsMRVBK9/SkpauV82u54QCghxg2 MS5FF9vF3UmFlFQ9n5slC1I= =nz7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1989502.IxaC9VGVD8--