From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9510 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 11:48:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 11:48:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CYNXo-0008Cf-Ok for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 11:48:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 23338 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2004 11:48:43 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 18250 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 11:48:43 +0000 From: Christian Parpart Organization: Gentoo Linux Foundation To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:48:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20041127232254.GA358@halffull.org> <20041128002838.57c9ea59@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20041128002838.57c9ea59@snowdrop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8428254.YrEk8G7lD1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411281248.38779.trapni@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Disabling "strip" in Emerge X-Archives-Salt: 47e77e4e-79b1-4271-830e-01b2a66bd95c X-Archives-Hash: 1460541d61998a6f56e110616355ef14 --nextPart8428254.YrEk8G7lD1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 28 November 2004 1:28 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:24:44 -0800 (PST) Sorav Bansal > > wrote: > | Hence, any project that calls install -s will be troublesome for me. > | Anyways, I really appreciate your help. In case you have any > | suggestions on how to get around the install -s problem, that would be > | great! > > As I recall from when we first started messing around with cross > compiling (we couldn't get strip to work...) the easiest way is to make > strip a symlink to /bin/true... OTOH, it shall be possible to provide a new eclass function (maybe executed= by=20 default) that modifies each existing Makefile that strips out all -s right= =20 behind "install" commands. Just like done with strip-flags for C[XX]FLAGS. That impossible? Christian Parpart. =2D-=20 http://www.winterschur.de/?fey <-- sheep me! Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt 12:46:25 up 30 days, 5:16, 2 users, load average: 1.10, 0.69, 0.58 --nextPart8428254.YrEk8G7lD1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBqbsWPpa2GmDVhK0RAhNKAJ4y+Uv9ttJCn5Usj3eZbFiJCSByfACeMtSm ZcmKW6F3ScNVsr5PfJeiKGo= =7EfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8428254.YrEk8G7lD1--