From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8513 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2004 21:24:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Oct 2004 21:24:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CO0hm-0000BE-Km for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 21:24:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 5594 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2004 21:24:09 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13291 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2004 21:24:09 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:24:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <1098993757.9091.107.camel@www.toruslaptop.com> <200410291155.32852.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200410301117.39860.stuart@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200410301117.39860.stuart@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1471362.Em6y5pscNp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410302324.14599.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] webapp-config and webapps X-Archives-Salt: 1dd0ea13-2bda-4147-88ba-0e2f1cb0f66d X-Archives-Hash: d7979b2a7330ec4b74136ecc9dfff7ce --nextPart1471362.Em6y5pscNp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 30 October 2004 12:17, Stuart Herbert wrote: > > I still consider it bad design. Even though I understand the reasons. > > Sorry - that statement's ambiguious. What's the "it" that you are referi= ng > to? Sorry, it in this case is those packages providing their own management=20 system, often in effect meaning that the security is worse than that of=20 windows. Applications should allways be able to run when they are not=20 owned/writeable by the user that runs them. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1471362.Em6y5pscNp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBhAZ+bKx5DBjWFdsRAhFbAKDp+d3K+FMkQDV4iz5TxYD6g+Zq+wCgli0w G/GgdJjLdxoPDO9Kn/iCY50= =auTI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1471362.Em6y5pscNp--