public inbox for gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LinuxGuy@Cox.net
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:18:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041028171811.GA2414@monolith.uml.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410272140460.21079@ybec.rq.iarg>

On 21:55 Wed 27 Oct     , Ed Grimm wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 LinuxGuy@Cox.net wrote:
> 
> > Hi there, i've been putting in alot of work on dispatch-conf lately,
> > adding features i personally need, and features that it should have. I
> > have a new version of dispatch-conf posted at bug:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
> >
> > i believe it will solve one of your major problems with dispatch-conf as
> > i have added a new option called "config file freezing" which allows you
> > to specify config files you never want to be overwritten, like
> > /etc/fstab /etc/password and /etc/group and so on. instead it will take
> > the new files that portage tries to pass out and apply them to rcs (or
> > archive them through whatever meathod you are using). I'm also taking
> > suggestions on features to be added, so if you, or anyone else feels
> > there are other features that should be added email me about it and
> > we'll talk about what/how should be added.
> 
> This does sound promising.  Note that I cannot fathom any reason why I'd
> want Gentoo's suggested updates archived into RCS for frozen files,
> unless they were not placed on the main branch - I use RCS to track my
> own changes, and I don't appreciate <censored>.
> 
> Ed
> 

A good point i suppose, my reasoning for adding the new files to rcs was
in case there were important changes in the new gentoo files that you
needed, though i suppose those files can be grabbed by recompiling,
however if it's a large app that can be a bit of a hassle. perhaps the
new configs for frozen files should be added to a different archive? or
perhaps to another file? filefoo_frozen or something? i'd like to hear
what others think about the issue.

also, several new features have been added as well, all command line
options. -c for "clobberall" which will overwrite all config files that
are not frozen without asking you anything. -p for "pretend" which will
display all files to be updated (with purdy colors {trying to mimic the
merge look}, frozen in blue, others in green). -a for "ask", like emerge
ask, and -f for "force" which will force all files to update even if
frozen.

more detailed explainations, along with the file for your testing
enjoyment are here:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618

another feature i was thinking of adding was a simple command line based
way to add/subtract frozen files, like euse -E and -D. anything think
this is a good or bad idea?

lastly, Ed, i was a little confused by your last statment:
and I don't appreciate <censored>.
i can't think of a swear that fits here, should i be offended? or was it
just a joke? either way, i missed it. oh well.

i appreciate any feedback on this so i can continue to improve
dispatch-conf


--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-28 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-20 22:02 [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary andrea ferraris
2004-10-21  8:30 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-21  9:52   ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-10-21 11:46     ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-21 12:44       ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-10-21 13:20         ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-21 13:52           ` Jason Stubbs
2004-10-24 17:44       ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-24 21:47         ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-25 21:06           ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-21 19:00     ` Nathaniel McCallum
2004-10-21 19:19       ` Luke-Jr
2004-10-22  8:07         ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-22 11:24           ` Jason Stubbs
2004-10-22 13:11             ` John Nilsson
2004-10-22 13:21               ` Jason Stubbs
2004-10-22 13:31               ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-22 19:33                 ` John Nilsson
2004-10-24  3:18   ` Ed Grimm
2004-10-24  9:15     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-24 11:27       ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-24 20:52         ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-24  9:33     ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-10-24 11:28       ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-25 18:47     ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf LinuxGuy
2004-10-28  2:55       ` Ed Grimm
2004-10-28 17:18         ` LinuxGuy [this message]
2004-11-12  9:23           ` Ed Grimm
2004-11-28 20:15             ` LinuxGuy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041028171811.GA2414@monolith.uml.net \
    --to=linuxguy@cox.net \
    --cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox