From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:44:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041021124435.GA14754@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04102104464437f153@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:46:14AM +0000, Roman Gaufman wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:52:16 +0200, Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org> wrote:
> What do you mean until .51_rc9? -- will it be included in .51?
> There's no way in hell I'm moving back to etc-update -- and frankly, I
> dont see how anyone can tolerate it :)
No, sorry for the confusion. What I meant was that I currently still have
_rc9 on my system so _if_ for some obscure reason dispatch-conf _would have
been moved_ to gentoolkit afterwards I wouldn't know it.
But that's not the case.
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
Documentation & PR project leader
The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-21 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 22:02 [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary andrea ferraris
2004-10-21 8:30 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-21 9:52 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-10-21 11:46 ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-21 12:44 ` Sven Vermeulen [this message]
2004-10-21 13:20 ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-21 13:52 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-10-24 17:44 ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-24 21:47 ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-25 21:06 ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-21 19:00 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2004-10-21 19:19 ` Luke-Jr
2004-10-22 8:07 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-22 11:24 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-10-22 13:11 ` John Nilsson
2004-10-22 13:21 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-10-22 13:31 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-22 19:33 ` John Nilsson
2004-10-24 3:18 ` Ed Grimm
2004-10-24 9:15 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-24 11:27 ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-24 20:52 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-24 9:33 ` Sven Vermeulen
2004-10-24 11:28 ` andrea ferraris
2004-10-25 18:47 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf LinuxGuy
2004-10-28 2:55 ` Ed Grimm
2004-10-28 17:18 ` LinuxGuy
2004-11-12 9:23 ` Ed Grimm
2004-11-28 20:15 ` LinuxGuy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041021124435.GA14754@gentoo.org \
--to=swift@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox